SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Silver prices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: long-gone who wrote (2219)10/8/1999 11:55:00 AM
From: goldsheet  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 8010
 
> With all due respect, PAAS is not a "pure play silver stock",
> as they also produce a rather large amount of lead(Pb).

In that case, there is no such thing as a pure play silver stock,
since silver ores are typically found along with lead and zinc.

Actually, PAAS actually produces much more zinc than lead, and zinc
is worth twice as much as lead so it contribute much more to revenues.

Check the 6 months to date numbers at their website;
panamericansilver.com

Silver 1,421,601 ounces @ 4.82/oz
Zinc 11,145 tonnes .46/lb
Lead 3,266 tonnes .23/lb

My primary point was to avoid firms such as Hecla and Couer d'Alene,
which produce large amounts of gold, since they are definitely NOT
pure silver plays.

Also, the biggest silver producers in the world are folks like Rio
Tinto, Freeport, Homestake, Echo Bay, TVX, and Buenaventura -
definitely not pur silver plays.



To: long-gone who wrote (2219)10/8/1999 11:58:00 AM
From: Alan Whirlwind  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8010
 
With all the lead available from Clinton's head, you'd think the stock would be tanking now.



To: long-gone who wrote (2219)10/17/1999 8:22:00 PM
From: TD  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 8010
 
A Case for Silver
gold-eagle.com