Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LOR who wrote (4674)	10/8/1999 8:59:00 AM
From: AriKirA	Respond to of 8117

Since we started a contest, there must be a winner... A contest without a winner is like a poker game for fun... Could it be that you edited the post after you initial post I don't remember reading that tidbit... LOR don't let us down [gggg] We've even got Michael pitching in a plaque... Just trying to put you in a spot :-) Kind Regards Ari

To: LOR who wrote (4674)	10/8/1999 9:59:00 AM
From: Jack Rayfield	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8117

LOR Sorry for the loose interpretation of your offer. As I understand it for someone to win they have to guess the date exactly and the order volume announced by Pyng on that date must fall within the range given in the guess provided by the contestant who properly guesses the date. I am with Ari I think that the contest should have two parts. Part I- Dinner with LOR: winner determined under the above rules. Probably will not be a winner. (Kind of like the $1,000,000 offered for a hole in one in a golf tournament). Part II- Pyng Plaque to be awarded to the contestant that guesses the date which is closest to the actual announcement date. The volume element of the guess could be used as a tiebreaker. Under this scenario there will be a winner. Let me know what you think. I think someone should win the Pyng "Mass Production Order" plaque even if they are not omniscient (all knowing). Thanks Jack