Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Gold who wrote (19451)	10/8/1999 12:20:00 PM
From: James Randall Ingram	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 25548

Make sense now? Not for me, Mike. 44 is just TOO ridiculous a number. I hope you're right, but i can't fathom collusion on that scale.

To: Mike Gold who wrote (19451)	10/8/1999 4:22:00 PM
From: Joe Bilich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

The fact that a given brokerage house can not deliver certificates does not mean that that house is itself short Medinah. Rather it suggests that there might be a composite (and, to me, presumably more concentrated) short position sufficiently large to cause a shortfall in total certificates big enough to effect many houses. It is very possible that the net client position (and house position, if any) at many of those 44 houses is in fact long.

To: Mike Gold who wrote (19451)	10/9/1999 1:53:00 PM
From: J. Nelson	Respond to of 25548

To: +Joe Bilich (19467 ) From: +J. Nelson Friday, Oct 8 1999 4:45PM ET Reply # of 19469 *ANYONE WITH DTC INFO...??? Would it be a company committed to settle this on going perennial problem. A call to their DTC would give the structure of the total stock holding and from looking at the SEC. trade records one could come very close to the total numbers of any over sell or short! The point is who can get the responding firm to give up the DTC numbers????? It would also show the totals for restricted etc. If it would stop the guessing game why not enamor us with the numbers???

To: Mike Gold who wrote (19451)	10/10/1999 12:25:00 AM
From: findstock	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 25548

Mike, the very first question at the AGM is why this company continues this kinda crap, can you believe not only did Patagonia put this in there release, but MDHM had the nerve to put it on there website...this is going on six weeks ago, and of course there will be no news on this come the AGM either WHAT?s LIKELY TO HAPPEN NEXT ?? The next key milestone for Medinah Mining is going to be the release of the GeoDatos geophysical survey results ? news is anticipated within the next few days.