SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (43824)10/8/1999 5:12:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 152472
 
Why are they leaving?

From the October 11, 1999, issue of Wireless Week

Executive Exodus At Canada's Telus

By James Careless

OTTAWA--What's going on at BCT.Telus? That's one of two questions analysts are asking about the western Canadian phone
company and its wireless subsidiary, Telus Mobility, following the unexpected departure of CEO George Petty, Vice President
George Addy and Executive Vice President Harry Truderung.

The other question: Did these executives and two others who've resigned in the past three months leave voluntarily, or were they
pushed?

Certainly Petty's resignation, announced by a news release Sept. 14, caught the Canadian industry by surprise. After all, the
25-year AT&T veteran had spent the last few years taking Canada by storm--first by negotiating the merger between Alberta's
Telus and British Columbia's BC TEL, then by declaring a competitive war with Bell Canada and Bell Mobility.

So what happened? Why did George Petty leave just months after the BCT.Telus merger, and before achieving his goal of
confronting Bell Canada?

Ask Petty and Telus' board of directors, and you get widely differing stories, except for one point: It's related to Petty's proposed
acquisitions of Clearnet Communications Inc. and Call-Net. Clearnet is a Canadian nationwide PCS carrier using the CDMA
standard--the same used by Telus Mobility. Call-Net is the parent of Sprint Canada, the nationwide long-distance operator that
competes with Bell Canada.

While costly, such a strategy would have given Telus a nationwide telecom package. It was a bold move in keeping with George
Petty's management style. That's why he made the proposal to Telus' directors.

"My job is to bring alternatives to the board," Petty told reporters during a conference call. "I would never bring anything to the
board that I didn't feel would work."

However, Telus Chairman Brian Canfield subsequently disputed Petty's story. In his own conference call, he said, "I don't deny
for a moment that we've had those discussions. What I am denying is that any of this ever got to a vote. And so, therefore,
George was never turned down."

Confusing? Yes. But the next fact is not in doubt: Having announced Sept. 14 that Petty would stay on while his successor was
sought, Telus then replaced him with Canfield Sept. 22.

Some wonder if the about-face was to punish Petty for going public. According to Telus spokesman Doug Strachan, that's not
why it happened. He says Canfield was appointed as interim CEO to provide "continuity" until a permanent CEO takes over.

Which brings us back to the second question: Were Petty and his cohorts pushed? No, says Strachan. "The executives that have
left have done so because of exercising options that they had."

Those "options" were both financially generous and time-sensitive, says Toronto telecom analyst Ian Angus. "All of Telus'
executives--the old Telus from before the merger--had contracts which allowed them to leave the company within six months
following a change of control and get very substantial payouts," he explains. By leaving now, "George Petty gets three times his
annual compensation. The others get two-and-a-half times."

So what's the truth? The closest we'll likely ever get to it is that George Petty may have been considering whether to resign and
cash in when he proposed the Clearnet/Call-Net acquisitions, then did so when the Telus board didn't back him. Now that he's
gone, it's clear that the company will continue to move eastward gradually, rather than in one fell swoop.

In a strange twist to Petty's departure, on Oct. 6 Call-Net announced Telus had floated a possible takeover offer.

Dogged by an $85 million loss in the second quarter, Call-Net chair Lawrence Tapp responded in a publicly-released letter, saying,
"Should you be interested in providing us with a proposal for the acquisition of all or part of Call-Net, Call-Net would be prepared
to discuss your interest at any time."

At press time, Telus had not issued any comment explaining its apparent about-face.