Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : IGCO - Intergold Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: robert burr who wrote (64)	10/9/1999 7:51:00 AM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69

Dejavue: to renegotiate their contract with igco for additional $$. IGCO is quick to point out that there is evidence of gold in the ground based on determinations other than the auric assays (microscopy, etc.). Chucka ala Chucaupt2 in June 1997 RE IPMCF...I don't have edit time for thew 1998 GPGI- Global Part of the AURIC story: ttp://www.techstocks.com/~wsapi/investor/reply-2729629 Message 2729629 siliconinvestor./~wsapi/investor/reply-2729629 RE: " ...The gold numbers are a far cry from the .25 opt at the AGM and no platinum verification YET. Hmmmm. What say you all?..." You see folks, Auric said those AGM ( 3 months earlier in June 97 from a contract to do the same as IGCO and failed and WANTED to re do something for something more I think was posted- the word RE NIG comes to mind) numbers but the release said...0.05 OPT AU amd 0.08 OPT PGMs Message 2729625 Message 2729625 siliconinvestor.com RE: ", My research tells me we're screwed." Chuca-this is the third time I heard this story. 333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 P.S.- I do belive that there are good and sufficient metals in the desert( & also at a Model in the Prairie of the Canadian Shield that goes down to MT and ID )( See my writing at Birchmountain thread Yet also see birchmountain.com website on the company slant), so that is not the issue..it is the Engineering that is the issue.

To: robert burr who wrote (64)	10/12/1999 5:25:00 PM
From: Wayne	Respond to of 69

I suspect there is going to be a lot more to the story than IGCO is putting out. According to their SEC filings, they have already given Auric and Geneva 3,500,000 shares and agreed to pay $500,000 for whatever it is that Auric claims to own. On the surface of it that seems like some kind of a sweetheart deal, as Auric's methods, as described in the SEC filings, are actually fairly routine. There's no evidence that they have contributed anything to the state of the art to justify a deal like that. If anything, IGCO might be doing this to try to get out of a bad deal they made in the first place. The most peculiar aspect of this is if Dames and Moore is actually withholding information about Auric's process. That isn't something a consultant would do given that they were hired to facilitate the process. I can believe that there might be something weird about Auric but the behavior attributed to D&M doesn't ring true to me.