Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: grok who wrote (31869)	10/9/1999 2:04:00 PM
From: TST	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

<I wish it would get on again because I consider these current problems to be a distraction from the long term problems which will eventually cause disruption for Intel/Rambus plans for the PC industry> You are quit specific here in wanting Intel/Rambus to fail. Now KZ you reveal yourself not to be objective, but malicious. Again, I ask you to state honestly who you work for. You have stated everything else without hesitation. You appear calm on the outside, but very angry & resentful on the inside which comes out in your posting, both in the frequency by which you post & the words you select. It goes beyond a friendly warning from a concerned former Rambus shareholder with 31 years in the semiconductor field trying to help others who don't understand what you do.

To: grok who wrote (31869)	10/9/1999 2:44:00 PM
From: denni	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

>>I think the fact that the solution has not been announced yet must be due to one of two possibilities: 1. They want to be very, very certain that the 2 RIMM products are solid as a rock before announcing. 2. The 2 RIMM solution doesn't work either. this makes sense. but the real answer is that intel wants to make sure the three slot is rock solid. hard rock cafe hear we come.

To: grok who wrote (31869)	10/9/1999 2:55:00 PM
From: richard surckla	Respond to of 93625

KZ:>>500 posts in the first 24 hours and about 400 will be directed at me claiming that I've been proven wrong.<< No matter which way it goes, I respect your posts. While I may not necessarily agree with all of them, I see you as neither long or short, but rather factual as you see it based on your honest and educated interpretation of the problem. That being said we won't know who is right or wrong until we hear from the talking heads at Intel and Rambus. In any event if the problem is solved don't look for any posts from me saying you were wrong. Have a nice vacation.