Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: I. N. Vester who wrote (15174)	10/9/1999 9:48:00 PM
From: MGV	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

I've said this before: Paul discredits himself. He needs no help from me. I've always believed we should learn from our mistakes and grow wiser with time. If anything I suppose I pity Paul because it is apparent to me that he hasn't accomplished either condition.

To: I. N. Vester who wrote (15174)	10/10/1999 12:06:00 AM
From: P. Ramamoorthy	Respond to of 27311

Thanks, someone has noticed a little short covering toward the end of last week. Next week could be a big deal for CC, if the conversion price was of any concern to the CC genius. Perhaps, outfits like Castle Creek could be getting people like John Merriweather from Long Term Capital or their Nobel prize winning advisers of derivative instruments, or someone of that caliber, to advise them how to proceed from here ie. how to improve their returns. May be, CC will join them in hedging against Russia's economic failure, next? Fundamentally, if VLNC is such a pathetic failure of a business, why CC was negotiating with VLNC? What was the point of negotiation for "three pounds of flesh" if there was to be no flesh at all to to begin with. Common sense? Or, lack thereof? The market only will tell us, soon! Ram