Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (1088)	10/10/1999 5:28:00 PM
From: Akula	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

My source disagrees about the interbreedability of dogs, but this is a fine point. What is necessary to a debate on evolution is a differentiation between micro- and macro-evolution. Many creationists try to define every type of documented evolution as micro-evolution in spite of all facts to the contrary. Duane Gish, a prominent creationist, once said that a "kind" was all organisms decended from a common stock. This definition, of course, is pointless to any rational discussion. I merely request that we define at what point genetic deviation gives rise to true evolution.