SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (68906)10/10/1999 1:53:00 PM
From: Henry Volquardsen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
from a reading of the article I think it is the latter, 1.04% (13% * 0.08) is pension related and 11.96 is business related



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (68906)10/10/1999 4:24:00 PM
From: zsteve  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
Skeeter,

RE-- GE's earning growth

this is from Barron's.
In 1997, pension income chipped in $331 million of GE's total earnings of $8.2 billion. In 1998, pension income accounted for $1.01 billion of the company's total earnings of $9.3 billion.

Okay, let's suppose that there was no contribution to earnings in either year (these are not, in any case, actual cash additions). Minus the noncash contributions from the pension plans, GE's '97 net was $7.9 billion; its '98 net amounted to $8.3 billion.

On that basis, the rise in earnings last year was roughly $400 million, or about 5.1%. And 5.1%, while respectable, is a good cut below the 13% the company triumphantly reported.

GE's shares, as we observed, are selling at some 40 times last year's earnings. Which is undeniably rich, but not unduly outrageous in this euphoric market, given the company's many admirable qualities, not least of which has been its ability to deliver 13% growth in earnings.

But that's the point: What kind of a multiple, our friend muses, would GE get for earnings growth of 5%, as it would have had to report last year, except for the help from pension income?