To: Winston Lee who wrote (364 ) 10/10/1999 8:31:00 PM From: Boplicity Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 570
re: went up +7 on anemic volume 660k - a negative sign. Wrong. Compared to the volume from the past 13 days it was very high. Furthermore the stock trading history is so new that those 13 days represent a 3rd of it. AGIL is way to new to be making calls like you did. re: Growth rates. Compared to other internets, AGIL's growth rate is average, at best. Wrong. AGIL is so new that you can't compare it to other Internets. Furthermore, you shouldn't be making such broad statements. IF you are going to compare growth rates first make est. of the potential market AGIL will be addressing and how fast it will develop, and use that as the forward looking potential growth rate. The Internet Procurement market place is set to explode, AGIL is connected some the best in the biz, , I feel they have laid a very nice base to build off of to explode right along with B2B ramp. re: This stock has a history of running up and dropping off a cliff. Wrong. AGIL has not been found, have not known what AGIL is, ORACLE change all that. re: Buy rating from small investment bank. To me, that is a classic signal that its proprietary dept. or one of its big clients wanted to unload. Wrong. Once again, AGIL is developing what I call investor mindshare, the story is not known, that is changing. Now, what better time own a company then now, before everyone else does finds out. re: TA indicating overbought condition Same as the my first rebut, too new to use TA. other then for very short term moves even then the data has no support. When using TA, one should always remember the underlining cause for the markings that appear one's screen. In other words, not enough investors have made a bet to understand the underlining forces. IMHO. Well I just finishing reading. Everyone agrees with you. Hmmm. Greg