To: tejek who wrote (74941 ) 10/11/1999 4:52:00 AM From: Goutam Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573213
Ted and Kash, Check this link out, for the specs on ASUS K7M. The site also has a nice picture of the mother board. When you get to the page, scroll down the page to get to the ASUS K7M section.translator.go.com (Translated to English) ASUS K7M news (07 October 1999 - hours 20.36): This is one of more the waits cards mothers for Athlon, just why produced from Asus, up to now considered one between the 3 better manufacturers than Mobo. Of continuation eccovi the technical detailed lists and one small photo of the card: _ SlotA, support to the Athlon from 500Mhz to 1 Ghz. _ 751 AMD chipset North Bridge, _ AGP 2.0, 1X and 2x. _ Frequencies of buses available, from 95 to 150 and 100 to 125 to steps of 1 Mhz _ Support Ultra Dma/66 _ Door parallel ECP/epp _ 2 seriali doors UART to alt… speed. _ 3 slot for DIMM. _ 4 slot Pci, 2 slot ISA, 1 slot AGP or _ 5 slot Pci, 1 slot ISA, álot AGP (optional) or _ 6 slot Pci, 0 slot ISA, álot AGP (optional) _ Wake-on-LAN _ Wake-on-Ring _ AMR interface _ Integrated audio Chip AC' 97. _ 4 doors USB. _________________________________ Motherboard discussion_____ I think, AMD has made a right decision to leave motherboard manufacturing to it's partners. If AMD had pushed it's own motherboards in Q3 - ÿÿÿÿ a) There still would have been Mobo shortage in Q3. IMHO, AMD underestimated Athlon yields, its manufacturability (based on sudden over capacity and AMD's postponing of Dresden production). AMD has no way of correctly foreseeing the demand (especially DIY market) for Athlons. ÿÿÿÿ b) The support from the Mobo partners wouldn't have been any where near the current level of support we are seeing. ÿÿÿÿ c) It wouldn't have made any difference to Compaq, or IBM; because their intention all along was to make their own motherboards. Compaq has been waiting for a long time to regain the competitive advantage by making their own motherboards as it used to. Engineering, and R&D in motherboards were their strengths in the past in differentiating their products from others. ÿÿÿÿ d) AMD was not in a position to know, if Intel was going to be rational or irrational with PIII prices. It could've been disastrous for AMD, if Intel had made any deeper cuts in PIII prices than it already had. The Mobo situation is getting better day by day. The motherboard problem won't be an issue within a few weeks. In the short term it looks bad, but in the long term, the Mobo infrastructure built on cooperation with external partners is going to prove very beneficial to AMD (if Athlon becomes an exceptional success, new product launches, greater inertia of resistance to Intel's ploys, etc.) Chipsets_______ Here, I'm with Kash. AMD is better equipped, and has technical skills to come out with advanced chipsets than Tiwanese companies - VIA, ALI, SIS, etc. Athlon has a lot of headroom on its bus side for improved system performance. Chipsets with advanced Main memory interface, video and I/O intf can improve the system performance greatly, by taking advantage of Athlon's high speed FSB. It can also be a good revenue generating area, if Athlon becomes a huge success. Some how I feel that, AMD is going to take this direction at least with single CPU systems. Regards, Goutama