To: slacker711 who wrote (2169 ) 10/19/1999 3:33:00 PM From: moat Respond to of 13582
Now that Qualcomm has officially extended the roadmap to include W-CDMA, what does it really mean? So that everyone is in sync, I thought the entire thread (especially the new comers) would benefit from some prospective from Gregg Powers as we discuss the matter ... First, it is my understanding that W-CDMA is aka Direct Spread (DS), Qualcomm's MSM5200 will support the DS mode of CDMA, and W-CDMA takes up 5mhz of spectrum. Q's normal CDMA modes (know as multi-carrier or cdma2000) all operate within 1.25mhz. Here is Qualcomm's press release regarding DS and MSM5200:corporate-ir.net Here are Gregg's thoughts on W-CDMA and fortress Europe:Message 4782459 Message 4789746 It is also useful to keep in mind what Luis Pineda, director of product marketing for the CDMA Technologies Division at Qualcomm, said in this article:To date, however, 3G is split into three competing and incompatible camps: W-CDMA, cdma2000, and UWC-136. Qualcomm is leading the charge for cdma2000, while Ericsson, Motorola, Nokia, NTT, and several other companies are pushing W-CDMA. The UWC-136 standard is an upgraded version of TDMA. Consequently, 3G networks will remain fragmented for some time, predicted Luis Pineda, director of product marketing for the CDMA Technologies Division at Qualcomm, San Diego. So chip makers must hedge their bets and support numerous standards, Pineda said. "We're broadening our product offerings based on the future developments of CDMA technology," he added. Above excerp came from:Message 11572529 In summary, it seems to me Qualcomm worked very hard (for years) to not have W-CDMA, but finally gave in because the train (3G) is moving down the track no matter what. From the prospective of the consumer the world would probably be better off without W-CDMA, but that is not to be because it would give existing IS-95 operators too much of an advantage over existing GSM operators. As Qualcomm shareholders, we probably would be better off without W-CDMA, but it's not going to be too bad with it either. Charlie Munger have said that a sign of the good business was that management would often have to choose between good or better. We'll have to settle for good this time (for now). We'll see what the operators do (choose) as they move forward. Lucky for us (for not being operators), as shareholders of Qualcomm all we have to do is count royalties (and track ASP and subscriber growth worldwide).