Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Repligen Corp (RGEN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Curtis E. Bemis who wrote (170)	10/11/1999 3:44:00 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 395

<Does this mean the testing methodology is flawed or that porcine sectretin is not it ?? (I'm not a bio-specialist)> O.K. I'll bite, although my experience is anecdotal only, and I am not a scientist, although I've followed the bio boards long enough to be dangerous on my trial knowledge... The typical autism story that I've heard [and there are others... metal intake? "True autism"? others] is that there is a stressor creating sickness [vaccine shots, allergans, both/combo] followed by anti-biotics. Gut is wiped out and yeast sets into the gut... yeasts have nasty bi-products that are neurotoxic and affect all sorts of areas of the brain depending on the individual... and causes the typical behaviors we see such as spinning, self-stimming. Now, secretin comes in to help the digestion of the newly wiped out gut [why they would be giving it to to year olds is beyond me] for one thing. Also, treating the yeast is VERY IMPORTANT... getting rid of the neurotoxins is very important, from the things I have heard [anecdotal remember] early treatment is a MUST! Damage is done certainly by 7-8 let along 10-12 years old. I have no reason to believe giving secretin to a 10 year old has ANYTHING to do with giving it to a 2-3 year old... when they should get it [according to DAN protecol and anecdotes I've heard. Here's the sad part... I have been told by 'specialists' in the field that they don't [wont] diagnose autism till 3 yrs old [no doubt why the protecol is 3- whatever], so the study is going with the old line beliefs about autism... I have to believe that these people doing the study have little clue. IMO only! DAK