SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (74994)10/11/1999 1:28:00 PM
From: Elmer  Respond to of 1577025
 
Re: "Elmer, it is important to note that in the test where Coppermine 600EB got 12% improvement in SPECint95_base and 20% in SPECfp95_base over a Katmai 600B, *both* processors were benefitting from the SSE optimizations. In my opinion, we'd see similar percentages if optimizations weren't used. Coppermine is indeed faster than Katmai clock-for-clock."

Exactly my point!

EP



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (74994)10/11/1999 2:26:00 PM
From: Charles R  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577025
 
<Coppermine is indeed faster than Katmai clock-for-clock.>

Wonder if anyone on this thread does not realize this - In the field of computer architecture this is like saying the sun rises in the East.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News