SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : KOB.TO - East Lost Hills & GSJB joint venture -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumell who wrote (5644)10/11/1999 3:32:00 PM
From: Brumell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15703
 
It appears the bit change LHG referred to is underway.
The following was posted by S&P on the SH thread.
It also appears the Temblor may come in at 14,400 - 14,500 as originally thought rather than higher. If we are now about 14,250 feet, and drill at say 2 - 3 ft/hr., we could be anywhere from a few to over 100 drilling hours away - after they resume drilling tomorrow morning.

Important Note: To keep S&Ps post in context, he was replying to someone concerned about another bit change.
________________________________________________________________________________

<< They are currently pulling out of the hole to change the bit.
I'm not sure why you said a bit trip... "doesn't bode well in my perspective".

You drill with a fresh bit. It digs some footage. It gets dull. You change the bit. Simple!

A bit trip is absolutely normal, and in this case I have heard that they are switching from the normal tri-cone type bits to a PDC bit.
Again, for the none oil&gas types out there, this is nothing unusual.
A tri-cone bit has (as the name suggests) three steel cones with "teeth" all around, that rotate as the bit is turned, grinding the rock beneath it in order to advance downwards.
A PDC bit has no moving parts, with teeth arranged on the fairly flat bottom surface.
No moving parts implies no bearings that may be susceptible to wear from both heavy use and high temperature.
In the right rock type, a PDC bit can drill very quickly.
The reason they don't use PDC's all the time is that they are very expensive. They typically drill very slowly in hard formations and chert will dull them quickly.

A little speculation on my part:
We are not into the Temblor yet, at approximately 14,250'. This is not a bad thing.
The original well prognosis called for the Temblor top at around 14,500'.
The VSP was interpreted such that the expected Temblor top was moved up by 500 feet to 14,050'.

I remember saying at the time, after talking to my more seismically proficient buddies, that the VSP was only as good as the interpreter, and 10 interpreters would likely come up with 100 different interpretations. Well, it appears that the particular interpretation that Berkley went with was one of the less correct ones (for whatever reason). Again, this is not a bad thing.
Does it mean we have a dry hole?
NOT AT ALL!
A single shot VSP at 14,000' is VERY "iffy". Especially so, when the exact lithologies and thicknesses are not known.
I have been told repeatedly that they are generally accurate only to 11,000' and then begin to get a little fuzzy.
IMO, a little too much faith was placed in the VSP.

I am personally very encouraged by the steady increase we have seen in the background gas readings. I am also personally sticking to the original well prognosis and am expecting the Temblor between 14,400' - 14,500'.

We should be drilling again by Tuesday morning, and who knows how fast they will go?

I remain extremely optimistic about CC (and 100% certain about ELH) and was a little PO'd that I was busy on Friday afternoon when we could have scooped up PYRX for $4. What a buy!

Be strong folks.
The roller-coaster ride has truly begun.
S&P >>



To: Brumell who wrote (5644)10/11/1999 4:18:00 PM
From: Hopsalong  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15703
 
Balancing speculative value and holding for the longer term

PYRX, being the only stock in play today, has been mentioned a couple of times already this Monday. Here's a plug.

If his whole play is as big as we think it is, (even if, gasp!, Cal Canal didn't come through) all of the companies, or at least their interests, are likely to get taken out by big oil some months down the road Then what? Most investors will take their money and move on. But there must be at least a few of us, who for tax purposes if nothing else, are looking to stay invested beyond that time. While I own three of these stocks, I've tried to position myself (at least in part) for the longer term. Because the biggies, POU and BKP, do not offer the speculative value I wanted, I looked beyond them.

Of all the publicly-traded companies in this play, this is the shy one and the one we probably hear the least about. From time to time PYRX comes up here. S&P mentions it now and again, most recently today over on Stockhouse, lamenting that he wasn't around Friday to buy some at 4. (S&P--FYI, while 4 was the close, we saw that price only for the final minute. I grabbed some at 2 1/4 maybe a minute before that).

F9driver in post 5484 said: "I am mystified that PYRX has not hit a new high. Without hype...it has some of the best financials of the group. Lowest debt. Carried drilling interests etc. Low float."

I agree. But beyond that, what attracted me was that they seem to have a different business plan than the other companies. They, along with Armstrong, found this play. And that is what their core business is--finding properties like this, farming them out, and collecting a carried interest* (reference below). Whether they can do it again is anybody's guess, but I'm betting they can. I'm not foolish enough to think that any or all future successes will be on the scale of ELH, but they don't really need to be to score big if there are proportionally fewer players involved. Pyr's next projects are already lined up. I could be wrong, but that doesn't seem to be the case with most of the other small companies.

Pros and Cons, anyone? Other candidates for long term holds? I'm all ears (I know that should be "eyes," but it doesn't read as well).

Reference
sec.gov
In annual report, PYR's description of their business:

"The Company is an independent oil and gas exploration company whose strategic focus is the application of advanced seismic imaging and computer-aided exploration technologies in the systematic search for commercial hydrocarbon reserves, primarily in the onshore western United States. The Company attempts to leverage its technical experience and expertise with seismic to identify exploration and exploitation projects with significant potential economic return."