SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qwest Communications (Q) (formerly QWST) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Harry J. who wrote (5238)10/11/1999 6:14:00 PM
From: KAF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6846
 
The following report was aired Monday on CNBC by reporter David Faber:

" It is not a surprise that BellSouth is now being viewed as a rumored suitor
for Qwest Communications. The company finally showed it is at least
willing to compete for a big prize, although it did lose its brief but heated
battle with MCI WorldCom for control of Sprint. It already owns 10% of
Qwest, and it has an agreement in place to market that company's services to
its own customers.

And even though it was boilerplate language in its filing when it bought that
10% stake in Qwest, BellSouth did admit that it had considered buying all of
Qwest. On thing, sources tell me, it never did was make a full-fledged offer
for the company despite what may have been the hopes of Qwest founder
Phil Anschutz that it would.

BellSouth's reluctance to bid had previously been chalked up to, among other
things, regulatory concerns. But given its willingness to go after Sprint
despite a law against its entry into long distance, such regulatory concerns
don't seem to be at issue now.

So the question remains whether the Sprint bid represented a true change in
strategy that could result in BellSouth biding for Qwest.

BellSouth is the only Baby Bell not to have completed a transforming
acquisition in the U.S. since it was spun off from Ma Bell.

A spokesman says BellSouth has never had an aversion to doing a large
acquisition, but has consistently told investors it will only do so when it
finds an opportunity that it believes will enhance shareholder value. Sprint
represented such an opportunity.

The spokesman says the company has ultimately had at least a look at most of
the major properties that have come up for sale in the telecom world, but
until Sprint, it decided against mounting a bid for any of them.

Qwest, as a provider of long-distance voice and data services, is somewhat
similar to Sprint.

The BellSouth spokesman said the company is happy with its 10% stake in
Qwest and the accompanying marketing agreement between the two
companies. BellSouth inked that deal last April, spending about $3.5 billion
to buy that 10% stake, paying $47.25 a share.

The spokesman declined comment on any rumors involving BellSouth's
acquisition plans. But sources close to both companies tell me that, while it
has no proposed deal, BellSouth is still thinking about bidding for Qwest,
and it has not yet in anyway I've heard, at least, made any sort of offer.

However, my sources tell me BellSouth does not want to own U.S. West,
which Qwest, of course, is slated to merge with. So if BellSouth did decide
to try and buy Qwest without U.S. West, it would have to move very quickly.

Qwest has a Nov. 2 shareholder vote on that deal. If BellSouth bids in the
next two weeks, it would give Joe Nacchio, the CEO of Qwest, time to take
the offer to the board and perhaps redirect his company's strategy as well.

If the board liked the deal, it could withdraw its support for the U.S. West
deal, although it couldn't terminate it. It would still need to go to a vote of its
shareholders for it to be terminated.

Qwest's 39% owner Phil Anschutz, well, he is contracted to vote in favor of
a U.S. West deal. And that would require that BellSouth will almost all of
the remaining 61% of the shares. Now it owns 10% so BellSouth would
have to carry about 80% of the votes cast aside from Anschutz's holdings.
And either way, BellSouth would be forced to pay U.S. West its $80 million
breakup fee.

This is already wreaking havoc on some arbs. They are short Qwest stock
and long U.S. West. That hurts when you're doing that arbitrage, as Qwest
goes up on speculation and U.S. West goes down. That's pain already being
felt despite what is only speculation."



To: Harry J. who wrote (5238)10/11/1999 6:25:00 PM
From: Harry J.  Respond to of 6846
 
Sorry for the math error (I'm going to blame it on a sticky calculator key). $0.05 per year at $39.0625 is 0.13136%. Hope nobody made an investment decision based on that.
8-)
Harry J.