Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Anthony@Pacific Member Vote -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: eims2000 who wrote (1363)	10/11/1999 6:46:00 PM
From: HairBall	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1638

eims2000: You may well be right, but that is not the point I am trying to make. Personally, if SI wanted to bring Tony back that is their decision to make. SI management offered up no facts on the case turning this vote strictly into a vote on popularity. All members should have been contacted prior to the vote and given the facts regarding Tony's ban, so they could first choose to vote or not and second if they chose to vote they could make an informed vote. This would have been fairer to the membership and Tony. SI Management offered NO facts and the membership was not apprised of the vote. Not all members look at the "hot list" regularly. I am protesting the methodology more than I am the outcome. However, in this case I believe the methodology assured the outcome, but I concede I have no way of knowing that for sure. Regards, LG