SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Traditional brokers/SEC conspiracy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J Gunn who wrote (46)10/12/1999 1:49:00 AM
From: nick nelson  Respond to of 104
 
The "Demutualization" - real SCARY!!... kind of like the retail individual investor(s)
being dragged from the frying pan into the fire screaming "A fair market?, equality of
opportunity?, and transparency for all?"... ha, ha, arrgggg!!

<<The Process
The process we envision will be to conduct a private placement under which
the NASD?s ownership of Nasdaq will shift over time from 100% to a minority
stake. The majority portion of the market would be owned by current NASD
members, securities firms, issuers, buy-side firms, and technology partners.

Nasdaq starts as a wholly owned subsidiary of the NASD. New Nasdaq shares
and warrants from NASD will be sold at fair market value to key strategic partners
in a private placement, with a subscription sale of warrants to all NASD members
who wish to purchase them. Control over the new entity will pass from NASD to
its new owners when Nasdaq is registered as an exchange with the SEC. Although
it is very uncertain at this point, these steps could be followed by an initial public
offering, possibly in 2000, that would substantially reduce the NASD?s ownership
position in, and effectively eliminate its control of, the Nasdaq Stock Market.
>>

The individual investors ends up with 10% of the spoils and the "Big players" CONTROL,
absolutely and unconditionally through MAJORITY vote, the EXPLOITATION of the
"engine" that fuels the markets.

The demutalization is a mechanism for the Nasdaq and for the NYSE
to change the "ground rules", i.e., provide a moving target to prevent
or delay the ECN's impending exchange status requests. They are dead in the
water with Datek and the other ECN's out-flanking them - they must move off-center
somehow to reestablish their existing monopolies.

A better solution would be to allow the NYSE (chg NYSE Rule 390, Rule 500) and the Nasdaq markets to
remain, as is, but both STRIPPED of their "self-regulatory" function. **A separate public
entity, through an initial public offering, would be created - controlled and administrated
by representatives of the retail investing public - which would DICTATE the rules,
regulations, and SANCTIONS that the markets must OBEY!
Then, and only then, will
the Nasdaq MM's and the NYSE specialists conduct a fair, equitable, and transparent
marketplace or they are FIRED!!

I can see the headlines now - WSJ DateLine: "100 Wall Street Traders FIRED for
failure to execute NBBO quickly, fairly, and in time/ordered priority!"

** The SEC will be invited to the retail investor's ~SRO meetings so that they will
be up-to-speed and NOT always a day late and a dollar short! As the "Advocate's
of the public investor" they must constantly be reminded of the distinction between the
"public", which they represent, and a "plutocrat", which they bend over for!



To: J Gunn who wrote (46)10/13/1999 11:01:00 AM
From: Wiselight  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 104
 
Whenever I watch CNBC I feel I am witnessing the biggest and most clever "boiler room" that has ever been given the right to operate. There seems to be most of the time a tremendous amount of hype and the false belief that the indexes will keep on moving higher forever. They are not very interested in bearish views or reality for that matter. What I am saying is that they are not only reporting facts but also, subtly, injecting bullishness to about everything. I wonder who are they working for? Do you see something similar?