Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (44188)	10/11/1999 8:40:00 PM
From: Summit X	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Dear Jim, I am sending you this message as a personal thanks for your making public your expertise in TA on the QCOM thread. I am sending this message in the public forums because I feel you are being bombarded by some lesser contributing thread members who wish only to hear their voices ring in unison with hollow unsubstantiated comments of the inefficiencies of TA and the market in general. Makes me wonder if those who are complaining are the ones who were buying your common at 224..... I lurk on this thread daily, with the goal being reading posts from yourself, Voltaire, and a couple others whose names escape me for the moment. We all now who the regular contributing thread members are. Most of the other content is simply entertaining drips - what some refer to as cholesterol in the flow of humanity. It would be a true shame to lose both Greg, and yourself, leaving the serious to suffer through the same, or as we gather steam, more drivel, in an effort to find the few remaining valuable posts. We know it takes a significant amount of time to review and transcribe your work here, and for that I thank you in the public forum. I'm not willing to let the lessers take my candy. What's that they say? If you want to get to him you've got to get through me. I suspect the number of me is now many. Perhaps this is a message which best would be sent via private mail, however I am not afraid of saying thank-you in public, so be it. SX.

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (44188)	10/11/1999 9:07:00 PM
From: Boplicity	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Hey Jim Willie, Wouldn't you say we have hit the upper channel line today and that we are due for a pull back from that line? G

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (44188)	10/11/1999 9:21:00 PM
From: Jimmyjohn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Make that 26. Your TA analyses are the best I have ever read bar none. DLTBGYD.

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (44188)	10/11/1999 9:48:00 PM
From: J Langholtz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Stick around Jim, the silent majority enjoys your posts.

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (44188)	10/12/1999 1:10:00 AM
From: Valueman	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 152472

so far, my count: the appreciative of TA = 25 the unappreciative = 3 Make that 4. No offense, but time looking at a chart is time away from making another call, reading another filing, analyzing another press release. In hundreds of useless posts here today, almost nothing was said about the key releases put out today. There are a number of earth shaking facts that "got no play." That is unfortunate as these are the facts that will make those lines squiggle in the future. P.S. If you have a "yard of s**t", you ought to have a GI doc look into that megacolon.