Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tim Luke who wrote (65299)	10/11/1999 11:47:00 PM
From: Jeff O'Brien	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90042

Tim, I'm not saying either is trying to buy CS. Just that CS has outperformed both of them over the last 100 days. They are beating the cream of the crop. Jeff

To: Tim Luke who wrote (65299)	10/12/1999 12:15:00 AM
From: charlie mcgeehan	Respond to of 90042

tim <<not a bad list eh>> careful now i think its written somewhere you have to be a canuck to say eh. eh

To: Tim Luke who wrote (65299)	10/12/1999 10:47:00 AM
From: jas cooper	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 90042

gec siemnes nok nt csco lu not a bad list eh Tim, I'm wondering. With GEC having recently bought FORE, what puts them at the top of your list? Is it solely based on Maria B's one line rumor three weeks ago, or is there some more compelling reason? Same thing with NT? Isn't enough on their networking plate with BAY? or LU with ASND? And from Chamber's recent comments, seems like CSCO is an unlikely suitor. This is not a shot, but a question that puzzles me. Perhaps you could explain your reasoning here. Thanks, jas.