Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: russet who wrote (4684)	10/12/1999 9:21:00 AM
From: gemsearcher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7235

Hello Russett. Now that we've all had enough turkey , some going-forward thoughts: 1. I don't see how SUF can realistically get $1 EPS out of known Klip reserves; while I have not done the math , at 50 cpht/say $100 per carat it would have to attain very high production rates to get there. That having been said , I would be happy with 50 - 70 cents. 2. Heads up - SUF is carrying Back Lake at about $5 million - see AR; with the latest NWT NR , will this be written off this year ? 3. Barbs/threats aside , Whisky's PM serves to highlight a fundamental dichotomy that SUF must (hopefully as Confluence has suggested with the help of an investment bank - PHNPI) soon address. It was not that long ago that SUF had roughly 8X the market cap that it does today - while the loss of part of M1 , a depressed resource sector and the costs/delays associated with SUF's Angolan investment have contributed to the decline (among other things) , the fact remains that SUF had about as much business trading at $20 then as it does trading at $2.50 now - i.e. very little. 4. IMO , bottom line is that SUF is still an exploration co. with one producing asset. I think that the market is not punishing SUF for spending the $ so much as disagreeing with where and how much was spent. 5. Messina could really turn this stock around big time if it is handled /structured/marketed properly. Regards.

To: russet who wrote (4684)	10/12/1999 11:47:00 AM
From: russet	Respond to of 7235

More love notes from Whisky, Tuesday, Oct 12 1999 9:35AM ET To: russett From: whisky Hey Russett, your the one who talked of being a squished hamster, I only make the point that in my view I wish you were squished, because then we wouldn't have to hear your two faced opinions anymore. But I should have assumed you had one brain cell left, but of course I was wrong. Go back under your little table, you little person. Besides If I wanted to threaten you, it would be a little more obvious than saying I'd like to squish the hamster. You truly are a goof.