Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (69044)	10/12/1999 10:29:00 PM
From: Terry Whitman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

>But, you never know. The suckers may never catch on that Intel is yanking their chains, posting no growth while selling at a huge growth multiple. <g>< Michael- How dare you let our secret out! Signed, Intel Board of Duh-wreck-tors

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (69044)	10/12/1999 10:31:00 PM
From: Bill F.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

mb-dont think that dog hunts anymore(G).

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (69044)	10/13/1999 8:43:00 AM
From: valueminded	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 132070

To all: Analysts never leave till the ship is sunk. I rarely see an analyst: 1. Say oops, I goofed you should have sold b4 earnings miss 2. downgrade to sell/hold on fundamental development if stock is "liquid" large cap technology and near yearly highs. I often see an analyst: 1. downgrade stock after a "announcement" with stock at yearly lows and investors already having lost a huge amount of money. 2. lower earnings estimate but maintain/increase ratings. Conclusion 1. Most analysts dont worry if stock is up 2. Most analysts are trend followers 3. At bottom of next bear market, most analysts will be issuing sell orders. All this imo Oh yea, one more thing, Intc will probably be up today.