Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (58860)	10/12/1999 11:01:00 PM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

If keeping Marcos meant keeping Clark and Subic, so be it. If keeping Marcos meant losing Clark and Subic, bye bye Marcos. It was clear by '83 that Marcos was falling apart and the communist insurrection was growing like a weed. It was actually pretty clear before then, but only if you looked carefully. Post-'83 it was undeniable. By those criteria we should have squeezed off the money and started serious talks with the reasonable opposition a lot sooner than we did. That was what I meant when I said that we were pursuing a policy contrary to self-interest.