SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mr. Pink's Picks: selected event-driven value investments -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: xcr600 who wrote (11624)10/12/1999 11:55:00 PM
From: Arcane Lore  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18998
 
I suspect what you're seeing here is a mini-tender offer. That is an offer to buy less than 5% of a company's shares. Historically, these are usually made at a price less than the currently prevailing market price. However, NAVR's closing price on 10/4 was $10 which is slightly less than the offer price of $10.25. I'm guessing that Growth Capital Corp. will not accept any of the tendered shares unless NAVR's price on 10/15 is enough greater than $10.25 to make it worth their while.

At the time of the last NAVR 10-Q there were 23,008,394 shares outstanding. 5% of the number outstanding is 1,150,419.7, thus 1,100,000 is the smallest multiple of 100,000 which represents less than 5% of the NAVR O/S.

There is a similar mini-tender offer being made for 1,000,000 Coinstar shares at a price of $10.00 (see growthcapital.org ). Coinstar's closing price today was 11 9/16. Its total O/S was 20,008,412 shares at the time of the last 10-Q, 5% of which is 1,000,420.6 shares.

The SEC recently instituted enforcement actions against two organizations which had conducted mini-tenders which, in the SEC's view, did not reveal sufficient information to shareholders - see #reply-11010471



To: xcr600 who wrote (11624)10/13/1999 9:37:00 PM
From: Mr. Pink  Read Replies (6) | Respond to of 18998
 
weird....dunno.

mp



To: xcr600 who wrote (11624)10/19/1999 9:20:00 PM
From: Ben Wa  Respond to of 18998
 
they may be the same bunch of characters that tried the same thing on wavx. the wavx folks were from tejas, also.