SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (29301)10/13/1999 2:20:00 AM
From: michael r potter  Respond to of 99985
 
Re:leveraging home. Faced with the same decision 3 1/2 yrs. ago, I almost took the logical route and mortgaged the house. Instead, I opted for no mortgage and less resulting "leverage" from the funds taken out of the market. Despite very good market years since [unrepeatably good!], I have had not one moment of regret. For one thing no debt of any kind makes for a much better emotional environment for decision making-especially for one who makes a living at this. Besides, if stocks, bonds, or any asset class gets totally flattened, that equity is always there for possible use-but because of the mind set of "total ownership", equity is not likely to be pulled out on a whim. Maybe not for everyone, but a ringing endorsement from here, despite the apparent lack of hard # historical logic. Also remember, with no interest deductions, and few other deductions one still benefits from the standard deduction, so one needs to compare that bogey to the after tax cost of borrowing for home ownership. RE: more conventional leveraging whether margin or options, before this cycle is complete, the majority will rue the day they ever heard about it. A few that truly understand them and use them like specialized tools in a tool-kit, will build a grand house. Just not the majority. thanks, Mike



To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (29301)10/13/1999 7:46:00 AM
From: Benkea  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Jacob:

First, no I don't consider an 80/20 LTV "leveraging" your home. I own my home outright, but I do have an 80/20 on a rental at 6 1/4% 30 yr fixed (obtained last summer - perfect accidental timing - with 3.75 pts). FWIW, upon my one year anniversary of ownership on 8/1/99, I raised (and got) the rents 20% on the property while the monthly nut is (and will remain) the same.

Second, I think anytime they are giving you money sub 7% (and tax deductible) for 30 years fixed, it is hard to turn it down. You can get more than 6 5/8% out a CD while you wait for rates to rise. I think you'll be able to buy 10% CDs in the next 5 to 10 years minimum and pocket the risk free spread. Of course, there are other much higher return ways that entail slightly more risk as well.



To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (29301)10/13/1999 8:23:00 AM
From: TimbaBear  Respond to of 99985
 
There is a big difference between deciding not to liquidate a portfolio as you did and what was claimed by the poster I was responding to. That poster claimed people were refinancing their homes to play the market, that's an entirely different head-state.

When people in your position ask me for advice, I tell them that unless they believe they can consistently earn a rate of return significantly higher that the interest rate on the mortgage, it makes more sense to pay more against the house....Since I am on commission, I am talking myself out of income by that advice, but good advice is good advice and I sleep well.