Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cosmo Daisey who wrote (44505)	10/13/1999 1:46:00 PM
From: cfoe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Interesting article from the "more formal" Q thread: Message 11532050 Note reference to sale to non-phone maker and continued use of Qualcomm name. Later post mentions LU and T as possibilities. Brings to mind my thought about Compaq again. Also these questions: Wouldn't this be more like a contract production kind of deal? Would this kind of outcome be better, neutral or worse than an outright sale to a Siemens or ERICY, etc.?

To: Cosmo Daisey who wrote (44505)	10/13/1999 1:48:00 PM
From: Jim Willie CB	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Cosmo, where you been, big guy? (some TA) last time you popped your head up, we rallied next day will history repeat itself? with such a sizeable move to new highs, do you agree with my premise that a RETEST OF HIGHS is warranted and to be expected in the next several trading days? on TA: with moves from 195 to 223 a 5/8 retracement takes us to about 212.5 a 3/8 retracement takes us to about 205.5 volume is strong today, a good sign we are in that range, certainly lower than my 214-218 range posted earlier I missed calling this pullback... sorry / Jim