Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Probart who wrote (42880)	10/13/1999 3:50:00 PM
From: Tunica Albuginea	Respond to of 116766

Probart: " Naz definitely down 75+ points tomorrow with INTC leading > you called it" I just remembered -the DOW and INTC debacle ~ 1995-96 when INTC missed estimates by 1 cent -current 2 cents is double that -current economic background is at least 8X (<vbg>) as bad as '95-96 -I sprinkled in to levitate the bake a little bit of hot air and gas taken specifically from ole 49r's very own homegrown mix: Message 11529947 and pronto! Cake is ready for serving, enjoy, TA@theHomeKitchen.com To: Tunica Albuginea who wrote (42829) From: Probart Wednesday, Oct 13 1999 3:15PM ET Reply # of 42880 <Naz definitely down 75+ points tomorrow with INTC leading.> you called it.

To: Probart who wrote (42880)	10/13/1999 3:59:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116766

Probart, RE:"To: +Tunica Albuginea (42829 ) From: +Probart Wednesday, Oct 13 1999 3:15PM ET Reply # of 42881 <Naz definitely down 75+ points tomorrow with INTC leading.> you called it." Sorry, but I called it. You should have read the post that TA was replying to. To: +Tom Byron (42811 ) From: +Jim McMannis Tuesday, Oct 12 1999 7:36PM ET Reply # of 42882 like down 75 on the nasdaq comp