Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (75388)	10/13/1999 4:39:00 PM
From: vince doran	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572877

Non-Intel 800/133 MHz CUmine benchs, and some more-or-less comparable Athlon benches, for those interested. If you have trouble using these links, go to Ace's page for the first and third, and firingsquad.com for the kyro review. I picked these Athlon reviews to find the same benchs. Many unknowns or uncontrolleds. Nitpickers help yourselves. CUmine 700 overclocked to 800/133 on bx board hardocp.com Athlon 800 on 100 board (supercooled, no board overclock) firingsquad.comhardware Athlon 600s overclocked to 810/125, 830/127.6, 850/130.7 www15.big.or.jp To the extent that a bottom line can be factored out of this, I would say that a 733/i820/RDRAM CUmine is going to be even or ahead of a 700/133 Athlon in many benchs, although there are a few that show a clear Athlon lead. One real wildcard in the CUMine review is the unknown video card, which could have some effect on some benchs. If I have time later I will post a table of the numbers. I think AMD better concentrate on getting some better chipsets into the market unless they can maintain a clear megahertz lead. Vince