SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: HairBall who wrote (29510)10/13/1999 10:22:00 PM
From: Robert Rose  Respond to of 99985
 
Is this author an MDA lurker??

-----------

Eerie Market Parallels Worry Some

latimes.com
==============================
Wed. Oct. 13, 1999 - Los Angeles Times

Eerie Market Parallels Worry Some

Stocks: Analysts point to similarities between conditions today and pre-crash periods of '29 and '87 Octobers. Others see mere
coincidences.

By WALTER HAMILTON, Times Staff Writer

Disappointing earnings reports late Tuesday from technology bellwethers Intel Corp. and Motorola Inc. couldn't have come at a worse
time for the stock market, some analysts say.

The stellar gains notched by those stocks and a relative handful of other tech issues in recent months have been among the few bright
spots in a market that has been weakening by many other measures.

On Tuesday, rising interest rates helped send the broad market sharply lower, with the Dow Jones industrials sinking 231.12 points, or
2.2%, to 10,417.06, even before Intel and Motorola reported earnings.

Now some analysts fear that the highflying tech sector could lead an even deeper slide. Those concerns are compounded by the calendar:
It's October, reviving memories of market crashes in this month in 1987 and 1929.

Also eerie to some analysts: The Dow peaked this year on Aug. 25, the same day it peaked in 1987. The index is down 8% from this
year's peak; at this point in 1987, just three days before it plunged 22.6%, the Dow was off 9% from its high.

And, as in late 1987, interest rates are rising with inflation concerns, at a time when stock valuations relative to underlying earnings are
near historic highs. The weak dollar, too, is an issue--this time versus the Japanese yen, while in 1987 the dollar was sliding versus the
German mark.

Wall Street's bulls say the comparisons aren't valid. They argue that stocks are merely undergoing a normal "correction" that will set the
stage for gains later this year.

"Actually, we have a really healthy market," contended Stan Harley, editor of Harley Market Letter in Camarillo. "The bull's not dead. It's
alive and well."

But many Wall Street "technicians"--analysts who track the market's historical patterns--say the strength in tech issues has masked the
fact that in the market overall, the number of stocks falling in price on any given day has recently been overwhelming the number rising.

"The health of the market has hardly looked any worse than it does now," said Ricky Harrington of Interstate/Johnson Lane, a brokerage
firm in Charlotte, N.C.

That weak breadth, as it's known, has existed for most of the last 18 months, but the disconnect between the broad market's performance
and the tech sector has been especially glaring lately.

To bearish analysts, that's a sign that the foundation of the market is deteriorating. Many investors have been afraid to own all but the most
glamorous stocks, such as Intel. If those highfliers finally crack, they could yank the rest of the market down hard with them, bears say.

Analysts point to other worrisome technical indicators:
* Even as major stock indexes rallied last week, the number of advancing stocks barely topped the number declining. In a healthy market,
winners usually far outnumber losers.
* Trading volume has been heavy lately on days when the market has fallen and lighter on days when it has rallied. That suggests that
investors are more anxious to sell than to buy.
* Some gauges of investor sentiment show that many investors remain fairly upbeat. In the contrarian ways of Wall Street, that's a
negative sign. Historically, markets rebound from sell-offs only after investors have become decidedly bearish and sell stocks in a rush.

"We probably have not had the flush-out type of bottom, and we probably have more selling to come," said Brian Belski, chief investment
strategist at George K. Baum & Co. in Kansas City, Mo.

The most bearish analysts point to similarities between today's environment and the 1929 and 1987 pre-crash periods, and note that in
both of those years, stocks crashed exactly 55 days after the Dow hit a peak. This year, as in 1987, the 55th day after the peak would be
Oct. 19--next Tuesday.

"It's a coincidence, but it's an eerie coincidence," Harrington said.

To bulls such as Harley, however, any parallel to 1987 means little. "I find it interesting," he said. "Does that mean we're going to crash on
Oct. 19? I don't think so."

Many analysts note that interest rates were far higher in 1987. Moreover, the reasons for the market's crash in that year--the Dow lost
508 points that Oct. 19, to 1,738.74--had much to do with portfolio managers' computerized selling that snowballed. Today, trading
would be halted at least temporarily if the Dow were to fall 10% in a day.



To: HairBall who wrote (29510)10/14/1999 7:21:00 AM
From: dennis michael patterson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
ST. He is looking for 1120 SPX ultimately.