SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Oil & Gas Companies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Syncrude who wrote (6898)10/14/1999 2:52:00 PM
From: GVTucker  Respond to of 24939
 
More MEL

14 dry holes is way beyond my understanding. The main problem from what I have deciphered is that the decline rates in existing wells is a lot higher than most people figured a year ago.

Current production is at a little more than 10,000 BOE/day. It wasn't too long ago that they thought the rate would be more like 12,000 BOE/day. They're still telling everyone that they'll be better than 13,000 BOE/day next year, but given this year's performance, everyone is in a prove it mode.

At the lower level of production, cash flow looks to be around $50mm this year, barring any more disappointments. That would put the cash flow multiple at 3.8x. If they can reach 13,000 BOE/day level next year, cash flow would pe >$80mm, and the cash flow multiple below 3x.



To: Syncrude who wrote (6898)10/14/1999 3:32:00 PM
From: johnlag  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24939
 
MEL - T

12 Dry holes in a row, I stand corrected. The company did end up firing the geologist that picked the previous locations.

Merit also is pushing their bank line. Two key areas are having problems. In Cessfort - water/gas ratio up significantly in the last year.

This is info I consider good, but check it out. I don't hold any position in MEL, though a short one would have been nice over the last month.

Cheers!