SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Felix Appolonia who wrote (90324)10/14/1999 5:27:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 186894
 
Felix and thread, Apple's chip shuffle upsets some customers:

news.cnet.com

Some quotes from the article:

The company said it will resolve a delay surrounding new versions of its Power Mac G4 systems by using processors that are slightly slower than originally planned. The 500-MHz system, for example, now will contain a 450-MHz chip, but sell at the same price.

The company only shipped 64,000 G4 systems during the quarter, less than half the number Apple had predicted, because of Motorola's inability to make enough of the fast versions of the processor. Apple also is enduring a shortage of iBook notebooks.

...

Apple surprised dealers and customers alike by canceling these orders and telling consumers that new Power Mac G4 systems would come with PowerPC G4 processors running at 350, 400, and 450 MHz, rather than with chips running at 400, 450, and 500 MHz. A G4 processor running at 500 MHz will not be available until the first calendar quarter of next year.

The product revision, however, did not come with a price cut. A customer that previously ordered a 450-MHz system for $2,499 would have to reorder a 450-MHz system and pay $350 more. Conversely, he can get a 400-MHz system, but at the price Apple originally planned to charge for the 450-MHz box.


Gee, Apple's setback upsets only some customers? Imagine how everyone would react if PCs had to take a 50 MHz penalty because of an "inability to make enough of the fast versions of the processor"? This applies equally to PCs equipped with either Intel or AMD processors.

Yeah, I know, Intel delayed Coppermine for a little while because of speed problems of their own. But at least Intel announced a delay, rather than force people who preordered systems at a given speed down to a lower speed.

Tenchusatsu