SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LBstocks who wrote (44755)10/14/1999 3:59:00 PM
From: Uncle Frank  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
>> Alex Cena of SSB just issued a report which says "Intel's Entry into CDMA Net Positive to QCOM"

I guess that means they've refreshed their inventory and want a brisk business tomorrow.

Or is hanging with Voltaire making me cynical?

uf



To: LBstocks who wrote (44755)10/14/1999 4:00:00 PM
From: Boplicity  Respond to of 152472
 
200 is the key, what a deal we got today. I just love U.S.A..

Captialist Pig.



To: LBstocks who wrote (44755)10/14/1999 4:05:00 PM
From: The Reaper  Respond to of 152472
 
You know, I just logged on with about ten minutes to go before close. I had heard about the INTC/DPC buyout. I read a few of the first posts of the day after the news and the worry about competition from INTC. What if Q! just says no to INTC as far as licensing. Q! had to have known that this buyout was coming because INTC would have had to make sure that Q! was going to license them before they did it. Otherwise INTC would have been buying DPC for reasons other than CDMA ASIC business. Is that possible? Don't think so since all the excitement is going to be in CDMA. Gotta believe that INTC and Q! are going to do this hand in hand and that would explain the move of some ASIC business to Taiwan Semi. INTC wants to be a player in this business and they MUST HAVE Q!'s blessing. I think any of you that bought this morning are geniuses! I'm already Q100 so I'm just going to hold on with white knuckles.

kirby



To: LBstocks who wrote (44755)10/14/1999 4:29:00 PM
From: The Reaper  Respond to of 152472
 
Well, don't I look stupid... am just now catching up with the reading on the previous posts and I just saw that I reiterated what you have already said. Sorry for the plagarism even though I didn't know it at the time.

I guess that wouldn't be plagarism then would it?

kirby



To: LBstocks who wrote (44755)10/14/1999 7:27:00 PM
From: Labrador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
So why doesn't Intel just buyout QCOM?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News