SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (75529)10/14/1999 4:35:00 PM
From: Cory Gault  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572447
 
Tejek:

Interesting your comments on DSP, especially the stock price movement coming from someone who obviously is a fanatic to religious proportions over a loser like AMD. Have you read any of the comments regarding AMD while it's stock has dropped, obviously you have. DSP had profits of only 9.5 million in recent quarter. Thats only 124 million better in the quarter than AMD. Also, you and your fellow jihad mates accusing Intel of not following standard accounting practices is hilarious. Of course their accounting practices aren't scrutinized, the SEC lets Intel do what they want, right?



To: tejek who wrote (75529)10/15/1999 12:35:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572447
 
Tejerk - Re: "Yes, and I understand that now you are no longer a chip company....that, in fact, the church of intc now is calling intc a networking company."

You prefer AMD - a not working company.

Paul



To: tejek who wrote (75529)10/15/1999 2:52:00 AM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572447
 
RE: "....and about some of the comments re DSP that surfaced during that time?"

Hi Tejek,

I referenced one of your AMD posts (the earlier one about DSP) for the Intel thread. Thanks.

I understand DSP missed their earnings. Do you know why they missed? And, specifically what comments? Your insight would be helpful.

Thanks,
Amy J