Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Football Forum (NFL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MakeAFuss who wrote (2861)	10/14/1999 6:04:00 PM
From: Thomas J. Graf	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 45644

MAF, I have to agree with Blankmind. The local boys glee club could have a winning record with the schedule that the Rams have for the rest of the year. I am very much NOT a proponent of history in sports...unlike just about everyone else in the world. The '9ers always win because the '9ers have always had a better team...to say that they will win still because they have won in the past means nothing to me. Also, there is no comparison in backup qbs...if it's Warner against Garcia, the smart money at this point goes heavily towards Warner. Rams win the West, by default if nothing else. Just one man's opinion...

To: MakeAFuss who wrote (2861)	10/14/1999 6:10:00 PM
From: blankmind	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 45644

49er cb's could not stay with the rams receivers. this will not matter if it is at the stick. unfortunately this is not the same bumbling rams team we are use to seeing the 49ers whip. clearly vermeil got lucky when banks went down, and he geniusly inserted the arena qb. check the quotes in st. louis, clearly this was not expected. every team has nicks, the rams also have a very soft schedule as atl had last year and the ravens have every year:-) i think only tenn, det and sf have a chance of beating the rams, of the teams remaining on their schedule, unless they just have a flat week.