Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LSI Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DWB who wrote (20193)	10/14/1999 10:22:00 PM
From: akmike	Respond to of 25814

Daniel-I just read your post after responding to Patrick. I obviously agree;esp. with #3. Best regards, Mike

To: DWB who wrote (20193)	10/14/1999 10:31:00 PM
From: patrick tang	Respond to of 25814

Wow, it almost sounds like it's between LSI's 0.18 vs TSMC's 0.18 vs Intel's 0.18. Whoever ramps that up first, has a big leg up. Assuming all three chip sets have equivalent or acceptable performances of course. I don't think 0.25um is any good - too much power consumption. TSMC can ramp 0.18um, I think we all know that. I don't think they have low k, but my guess is that is not needed. ( will low k provide a significant lower power consumption too?) Intel has probably tied up their 0.18 for next 6 to 9 months for the CPUs. Anybody's got any good news on how LSI's 0.18um is ramping? patrick