SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Stock Swap -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Andrew Vance who wrote (16759)10/15/1999 6:34:00 AM
From: Andrew Vance  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17305
 
*AV* - we never shy away from negativity. We received the following letter from a lurker and are publishing it here for all to see. First, we will give our response and we have made no excuses. Apparently the trial reader did not fully understand how we go after stocks.

First, hold onto the stock since it will recover. Second, since the time frame you have spoken about, we have been in and out of WFR 2-3 times (I think two). I stand by
the decision and it will recover. However, a very critical error was made with WFR. We had a LLT on WFR at $20 which triggered a few days before. The only day that WFR traded at $18 was your first day of receiving the newsletter. It got as high as $18.38 on 9/21 and closed at $18 for the day. From there, WFR declined to its present levels on a consistent basis, with one or two days where it had a meaningless up-tick. The stock was closing lower each day.

What we have here was a misunderstanding of what our comment was abnd what we meant. I wish you would have asked us about the stock and for a clarification. We will take note of this and make sure we do a better job of explaining our duscipline and technique to new readers. We are working on a simple primer.

We never enter a stock that is in a declining pattern, we mentioned WFR was good under 18 but we also were waiting for it to hit a bottom. Looking over the daily data, and using the disciplines and strategies we follow, we would not have entered the stock until Monday October 4th, which is around when we did. I need to go back to the newsletter itself and see if any purchases were made. We have a table that shows our purchases of stocks.

We regret that you misinterpreted our comments but we still stand behind them. WFR was declining off the $20 LLT since Sept 14th and we were adjusting the BZ price downward as it was declining. It was not until Oct 1st that WFR hit its bottom, $12, which we could say was the right time to actually enter. Instead, on Monday, when it reached $11.50 and then broke above $12, we entered when it got to the
$12.50 to $13.50 range, only to see it finish the day at $15. We subsequently sold and I believe we are now in at an average price just above $13.

As far as seeing the exit signal, you are right. I reported that and chose to stay a bit longer in the stock, which is my personal perogative, which turned out to be a mistake. As a matter of fact, I personally exited WFR on 10/01 for a 7% losss and got in again subsequent to that.

You point out a very troublesome situation. Naturally, I think that every trial subscriber will subscribe and be able to keepo current on what we are doing, but that is not the case. Second, I have never consciously not answered email from here or from anyone that had a specific question (I may be late but I try to reply). So, for better or worse (worse in your case), I need to address some sort of feedback to trial subscribers if they do not continue with a subscription.

And to re-address the, what should I do question, I still say wait out the storm. I sat on $10 shares in WFR for months only to see it drop to $3.75 and then move up only to collpase to $6 early this year when the Rights offering occurred. We exercised our rights and we added shares, we averaged down, and we took this stock up to the $20 range. It was there once and it will get there again. Right now themarket is spooked because of a lie from VEBA, who owns more than 70% of the company shares.

After 3 rumors were published in a German Newspaper a few months ago about VEBA selling off their interest in WFR (which were strongly denied by the company), the VEBA-VIAG merger was announced and VEBA stated they were going to divest themselves of WFR. The market repsonded atrociously because VEBA will dictate the terms of the sale with the rest of us hung out to dry. We brought this to the attention of our readers and cautioned them what some of the implications could be. The following story appeared on 9/27 and would not have been in the last issue you received.

Monday September 27, 7:04 am Eastern Time
Memc Majority Shareholder Veba to Merge With Viag

New Company to Focus on Core Businesses

ST. PETERS, MO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--September 27, 1999-- Divestitures of Certain Non-Core Businesses

VEBA AG, the majority shareholder of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. (NYSE: WFR - news), today announced a merger with VIAG AG.

The combined VEBA/VIAG group has stated in a press release today that its core businesses will be energy and specialty chemicals. The new company's intention is to systematically and optimally divest certain non-core businesses, including MEMC. MEMC intends to work closely with VEBA to effectuate an orderly divestiture process that preserves and optimizes the value of MEMC.

MEMC is a leading global producer of silicon wafers. The silicon wafer is the fundamental building block of semiconductors, which, in turn, are found in every type of microelectronics application, including computer systems, telecommunications equipment, automobiles, consumer
electronics products, industrial automation and control systems.


The stock opened at $16.44 and closed at $14.19 that day. It has closed at $16.13 on the prior Friday afternoon. This was an unexpected knife in the chest to many of the minority shareholders and we knew it would spark volatility.

So, I do not know really what to say, except that continuity of the newsletter was not there for you to see everything that was going on. I can't Monday Morning quarterback on this stock and say that, on the news, you could have exited at a minor loss and wait for the dust to clear. I can go back to that issue and the issues since and cull out all of the discussions we had on this subject.

As I stated before, my perosnal shares are at $13.06 and I intend to average down with more shares as soon as I feel a bottom has been reached. Who knows, we might even get another pop like on the 4th of October when the stock was up $3 for the day. As far as a target price is concerned, I think $24-$28 is still doable within the next year, IF Veba doesn't screw us over and dump WFR on someone. We hope Veba has enough integrity to find a proper buyer who is willing to pay a respectable price and allows us to trade our shares in for shares in the new company.

Andrew

Andrew,

I saw on Stock Swap that you have 300% gain in this year. That is very impressive. You also said that there is not
a single customer to complain yet. If somebody has to start,
I do not mind to be the first one. Well, actually I am not sure if I can be counted as a "customer" since I only got 1-week subscription for free from 9/21-9/27.
You were promoting WFR heavily. At least twice you listed WFR as Priority of the day stock, and said that at under 18 it is a bargain. I got 850 shares just above 17 and thought I did a good trade.
It immediately tanked. Now sitting at 11-12 range and looks like going further, what should I do?

The funny thing is that you post something on Stock Swap later saying that you saw the exit signal but choose to stay. That is not fair, since you stated in your Radarview as if it is a good deal to buy under 18, rather than just hold if already have a position.

You also have my permission to publish this letter if you choose to, but please do not publish my name and email address. I am a lurker of SI.

Hope you success in your newsletter but I am not convinced to pay for it yet, based on the recommendation I saw. You may have some good calls but I am the unlucky one.



To: Andrew Vance who wrote (16759)10/15/1999 10:09:00 AM
From: Filbert  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17305
 
Ok we'll try something new. I'm not really one for flaming or hand grenades; although I've been accused of blowing hot air on occasion <G>.

WFR - I am still concerned about the VEBA sale implications. They seem to be standing there with a bat on any talks. Obviously semiconductors are made on WFRers, but it seems to me that the possibility exists that there might be a negative effect of the sale on the stock price. For instance, despite improving earnings and profits, the overall stock price stays depressed because of the VEBA sale situation.

SILENCE ON THREAD - I think that one of the reasons that the thread is a bit silent is because of the previous semiconductor focus tendency of the discussion. While it is a "community run thread", your contribution to it has been significant. A number of people that used to discuss matters here probably don't anymore out of respect for your new business venture. I know that I only picked WFR to discuss 'cause I've seen you discuss it on the WFR thread. I respect your efforts in your new business entity as well, and asking about stocks that you cover in the newsletter is sort of like asking for freebie information, so I (we, maybe) don't ask about it because of the fact that we want you to be successful.

However. I always viewed this thread as being one to follow because of the community efforts at picking stocks which leads me to . . .

NEW STUFF (for want of a snazzier term)- Since there is a rather large universe of stocks out there, perhaps there are other tech areas or non-tech sectors to build experience and especially $$$. I remember a while ago you and Jeffrey Mitchell I believe sussing out the D. H. Blair pumping of Entremed and the way that you played that out on the thread was very interesting. There were many discussions about the Y2K stocks at one time, although those were not always so pleasant <G>. One of the areas I am interested in at the moment is the banking sector. It seems to me that it is getting a pounding ahead of the Y2K scenario. Am I correct in assuming that the banks will take off again once the Y2K stuff is accounted for? When is the proper time to purchase? How does one evaluate a good bank from a bad bank? Are banks even something we want to discuss on what has been essentially a tech thread (although I know auto parts were discussed here at one time).

Anyway, I have always appreciated the contributions of the folks that made up the thread. I posted the above in an effort to give my impression regarding the falloff in posting and in an attempt to provide a basis for possible future discussions. My posting was intended to be positive in all of its statements including the lame attempts at humor. Any attempts at attributing negative vibes, taking what was written in a negative way, or being insulted, defensive, or angry are expressly denied beforehand. Anyone may insult my writing style or longwindedness if they wish <G>.

Filbert