Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : INTERNET ASIA + Indexes -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (1330)	10/15/1999 1:29:00 AM
From: StockDung	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1567

"Look at WINR for example, a heavily shorted stock, up today 11.4% on 136,000 shares, compared to 28,000 yesterday" Wow Francois, pennies from heaven. What a bafoon. How is shorting a stock under a buck? What a fool you make of yourself everyday. 0.875 Bid 0.906 ASK WINR - WINNERS INTERNET NETWORK INC Exchange: OTC BB Delay: at least 15 minutes Last Price: 0.906 at 16:00 EDT Change: Up 0.094 (+11.58%) High: 0.937 Low: 0.781 at 9:32 EDT Open: 0.781 Previous Close: 0.812 on 10/13 Volume: 135,900 Currency Units: US Dollar Confirm all data with your broker or financial advisor before trading. Data by: S&P ComStock

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (1330)	10/16/1999 11:36:00 PM
From: Jeffrey L. Henken	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1567

Only time will tell how big a rally we see in stocks that have been naked shorted in Canada. It is not just OTC BB stocks that have been naked shorted in Canada. This practice is no longer going to be overlooked. Accounts are being closed north of the border now. Clearly this should help some of us who are long on some of these stocks. Naked shorting is clearly a violation of trading rules in US Markets. Also I would like to state that for those who believe that these rule changes will not ultimately be enforced in all markets where US securities are traded outside the US: I believe you will be proven wrong. Thanks, Jeff