SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Softbank Group Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mact who wrote (2077)10/15/1999 5:56:00 PM
From: swisstrader  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6018
 
mact...good catch...here's a reprint...this is a BIGGIE!:

October 15, 1999

Seeking More High-Tech Home Runs,
Softbank Places a Bet on 'Incubator'
By LISA BRANSTEN
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL INTERACTIVE EDITION

One of the most successful Internet investors is about to hatch a new project.

A venture-capital arm of Softbank Corp. is moving into new offices in Mountain View, Calif., to launch Hotbank, an incubator for new technology startups.

Incubators are a red-hot trend in venture capital. They offer facilities where multiple start-ups have ready access to office space, support services and hands-on help from experienced managers. The current effort by Softbank Venture Capital is particularly ambitious. The Mountain View facility will have room to start and nurture 10 to 12 new technology companies.

And Softbank doesn't plan to stop with Silicon Valley. Gary Reischel, Softbank Venture Capital's executive managing director, wants to help support a nationwide network of incubators that will be funded by others but carry the HotBank brand. A Boston affiliate is slated to open in November, and a total of six are expected by the end of the year.

The venture firm's parent has an enviable track record in backing new technologies. For example, it funded such successful start-ups as Yahoo! Inc. and E*Trade Group Inc.


Incubators have been tried in various forms since the early 1980s. But many of the early facilities were set up by local business-development agencies or nonprofit organizations or as part of do-good efforts by large corporations, and often had little to show for their efforts. The new incubators are attracting entrepreneurs from Silicon Valley, southern California, Atlanta and elsewhere and have already produced some notable hits.

For example, idealab!, a Pasadena, Calif., venture started in 1998 by entrepreneur Bill Gross, has launched such companies as Internet toy retailer eToys Inc. and GoTo.com Inc., which runs an Internet search engine. For an initial investment of a few hundred thousand dollars, idealab's stake in eToys is now valued at more than $1 billion.

Incubators are particularly useful now that Internet businesses are forming and changing so fast. New enterprises need constant consultation with their investors, something that is much easier if venture partners have offices in the same building as the companies they fund.

"The model of the ivory tower venture capitalists going to visit their companies -- I think that's broken," Softbank's Mr. Reischel says.

Another factor driving the new incubators is a desire by venture capitalists to build relationships with entrepreneurs early in the life cycles of their companies, says Mike Roberts, executive director of entrepreneurial studies at Harvard University's Graduate School of Business. Incubator services offer a way for venture-capital firms to make themselves more attractive than rival financial backers.

'Deal Flow'

"For people who write $10 million checks at the drop of a hat ... [an incubator] is a very inexpensive way to attract deal flow," Mr. Roberts says.

One potential pitfall of incubators is that venture capitalists may not have the time to closely monitor these very early-stage companies, even if they are in the same location. "It's a model that requires more time" from investors, Mr. Roberts says. "Presumably these people were busy before they started the incubator. Where does the extra time come from?"

But backers of the concept say physical proximity brings many benefits -- including the chance to swap ideas with other entrepreneurs and with investors that have worked with many businesses. At idealab, for example, Mr. Gross has made such informal interaction easier by setting up a glassed-in office along the flat base of a semicircular space, from which he can see the different "pods" of companies at work.

David Eisner, chief executive officer of iExchange.com Inc., developed his business plans with the aid of brainstorming sessions with Mr. Gross. He says ideaLab's facilities were extremely helpful in launching his company, which operates a Web site that consolidates information about stocks from analysts, chat rooms and other sources.

"None of the infrastructure issues that most founders of new companies have to face did I have to face," Mr. Eisner says. "I didn't need to find space, to buy office furniture, to set up an accounting system." Also, although he quickly had to hire his own team of Web site developers, he says, "ideaLab came up with ... Web-development people to get us started."

Other recently founded private incubators include eCompanies, started by Skye Dayton, founder and chairman of the Internet service provider EarthLink Network Inc., and Jake Winebaum, former head of Walt Disney Co.'s Buena Vista Internet group. That duo raised a $130 million fund to finance start-ups. And in August, Jeff Levy, who founded Internet ad measurement company RelevantKnowledge, Inc. and sold it to rival Media Metrix Inc., founded eHatchery, an incubator based in Atlanta.

Some venture capitalists see the possibility of long-range cooperation among start-ups they fund as akin to the networks of associations among some Japanese companies. Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, the best-known Silicon Valley venture firm, even uses the Japanese term "keiretsu" to describe its strategy.

Legal Papers

Other benefits are expected to be more concrete. The Silicon Valley office of HotBank will have people on staff to help companies with such administrative tasks as drawing up legal papers, getting bank financing and even negotiating with media outlets for advertising space.

Softbank Venture Capital plans to spend about $2 million on the 40,000-square-foot Silicon Valley incubator, which will be able to draw from a $600 million Softbank venture fund. It expects that the average investment in an incubator-based firm will be $300,000 to $1 million, much smaller than a typical venture investment.

The hatchlings won't be allowed to stay in the nest long: They will have to get a second round of financing and be out of the incubator in six months, Mr. Reischel says.



To: mact who wrote (2077)10/17/1999 9:48:00 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 6018
 
Hello Mact and rest of SI sftbf board, missed you all. Happy that 9984 is basically at the same level as when I went holiday-ing. Italy (Rome/Assisi/Florence) were beautiful and inspiring places with staggering (and standing) history and great food (though need to eat fruits and veggies for remaining of October), but no access to "interneto" until I got to the Rome Hilton on last day of trip when the DJIA tanked 260 points.

Mr. Greenspan seems to be chatting down the market in the US to save us from sudden and implosive grief. HK market is apparently being manipulated downward by the big boys wishing to trim the government's profit (+68% so far) on the coming (October 25th) unloading of index shares purchased during the heat of market intervention a year ago (good opportunity to pick up Hong Kong & Shanghai Bank (5), Cheung Kong (1) and SHK Properties (16) for those so inclined to diversify).

My RMBS stablized, RTRSY tanked, Sony, Yhoo and rest of i-net shares holding firm, and Vertical Net (VERT) is way up. Purchased back (closing) some VERT put options at half the price I sold them for.

I remain optismistic for continued runup in top class i-net (last boys standing) shares between now and Christmas/New Years (Y2K or no Y2K), but caution seems to be in order for time beyond late January. What is our collective view?

Lastly, try www.witcapital.com for research on i-net companies not covered by the big houses.

and finally, one of us ought to fee www.iexchange.com on sftbf.