Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Catfish who wrote (7853)	10/15/1999 8:20:00 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

This is from the NEALZ NUZE of the Neal Boortz web site. Do his parents know how much time he's wasting on the internet? They should get some kind of blocking software. TP

To: Catfish who wrote (7853)	10/16/1999 2:16:00 AM
From: sandintoes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Excellent Post, Gemini. Thank you very much. What Boortz says, sums it up better than anything else that I've read.

To: Catfish who wrote (7853)	10/16/1999 12:09:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

No rest for the corrupt: nytimes.com

To: Catfish who wrote (7853)	10/17/1999 2:14:00 PM
From: Les H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

There's a lot of things wrong with the treaty: (1) The rogue nations haven't signed and are unlikely to. (2) The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty has never worked, and the U.S. just gives mild lip service or turns the other way when China helps Pakistan, N. Korea, or Iran get weapons capability. (3) Abandoning testing of US weapons allows the US deterrent to degrade and decreases the reliability of the deterrent threat. The use of mathematical models doesn't guarantee the reliability of a weapon. You still need physical tests to verify the reliability of models which change over time. (4) There would be a requirement for seismic detection equipment to be placed all over the world and in many places, we aren't likely to be allowed. (5) The detection equipment are ineffective in detecting low tonnage tests and where larger tests are decoupled. The treaty would be about as effective as the earlier nuclear treaties. We're still worrying about nuclear weapons and chemical weapons after the limitation, reduction, non-proliferation treaties of the past 30 years.