Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bridge Player who wrote (315)	10/15/1999 9:37:00 PM
From: DOUG H	Respond to of 35685

LOL! No venom there.

To: Bridge Player who wrote (315)	10/15/1999 10:00:00 PM
From: DOUG H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

BP, This is the opening paragraph from the first post you posted to this thread. You are no doubt a smart person but I think your having trouble distiguishing personal attacks from debate. BTW, after this post, Voltaire's response to you was to welcome the diversity of ideas to the thread. It's disappointing when someone is show class the can't reciprocate in kind. ............................................................ It is absolutely unbelievable that a guy who posts such pseudo-scientific nonsense can have developed a following on SI as something of a seer. This from a guy who confidently assured us just last Wednesday that the "Houses" were not going to let the market go down much further. >>>Anyone who actually believes any of this garbage is as much a fool as the guy who posts it is full of bs.>>>> ............................................................ My posts against Voltaire have been against his ideas, and his <<often-flaunted ego and arrogance,>>>??? and not personal attacks. But since you seem to be unable to engage me on the basis of ideas but choose to pursue personal attacks, I can play that game too. ............................................................ Chill.