SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Green who wrote (32235)10/15/1999 11:27:00 PM
From: richard surckla  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Coach Don... you always have an excuse. Tonight is no exception. It's always too this, or too that. Just sitting on the bench and coaching that's what you like to do... and doing a poor job at that. Why not go to your web site and talk to yourself. Maybe you'll learn something.



To: Don Green who wrote (32235)10/15/1999 11:35:00 PM
From: richard surckla  Respond to of 93625
 
Coach Don, I know for sure if you go to your web site and post, that you will get at least 68% approval and agreement on your posts.



To: Don Green who wrote (32235)10/15/1999 11:42:00 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
The Point is
The point is some people like to see their name in print.

Rambus may be, I think probably, be down with the market on Monday. There is still nothing on the horizon besides Rambus. It's going to be big because it has to be for the rest of the big players to win.
Buy now or buy later, you still win.
TP



To: Don Green who wrote (32235)10/15/1999 11:45:00 PM
From: Don Green  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Rambus shares fall as analyst questions results
BY ERIC AUCHARD

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The shares of volatile Rambus Inc. fell in erratic trading Friday, ending the day more than $2 lower despite better-than-expected fourth quarter results after an analyst questioned the company's accounting.

BancBoston Robertson Stephens financial analyst Daniel Niles said he was concerned that $3.3 million, or more than a quarter of the $12.3 million in fourth-quarter revenues stemmed from Rambus speeding up its schedule for recognizing key contract revenues to a shorter 4-year timeframe instead of a 5-year span.

But Rambus Chief Financial Officer Gary Harmon said his company was just recognizing revenue from contracts that were largely complete. He said that demonstrating the viability of Rambus technology at five of the world's six top memory chip makers had taken less than the five years originally forecast.

Rambus shares dropped as much 4-1/4 early Friday morning, then rallied back into positive territory on the Nasdaq stock market, only to retreat to 70-9/16 at the close, down 2-3/16 on the day.

''We have a number of DRAM makers who have validated Direct Rambus parts,'' Harmon said of technology Rambus sells to memory chip makers to speed personal computer performance. ''So we can see the support period ending ... There's no more than 4 quarters left of support for those DRAM contracts.''

Other financial analysts rallied to the company's defense.

''I thought the earnings were solid,'' said Morgan Stanley Dean Witter analyst Mark Edelstone. ''The change in accounting just points out their historically conservative accounting.''

Edelstone tells clients Rambus stock will outperform the market, despite some current uncertainty over just when Intel Corp. will introduce Rambus-based products, which he and other analysts consider the stock's next big driver.

''I think its a waste of time to focus on these changes in these accounting principles,'' agreed Warburg Dillon Read analyst Seth Dixon.

''It happens they were too conservative with their contracts, which were based on completion of certain milestones,'' Dixon said. ''They had deferred revenue and they have completed those contracts already.''

In response to his concerns, Niles said he downgraded his stock rating on Rambus to market performer from long-term attractive and slashed his earnings estimate for fiscal 2000.

He cut his estimate for the fiscal year ending September, 2000 to 47 cents per share from 75 cents per share.

Thursday, Rambus reported net income of $2.7 million, or 10 cents per diluted share, on revenues of $12.3 million, compared with $2.0 million, or 8 cents per share, on revenue of $10.6 million in the fourth quarter ended Sept. 1998.

At the same time, Rambus has had to weather major delays in the introduction of its memory-enhancing technology into a much-delayed new chipset from Intel Corp., the world's top chip maker, he noted.

Rambus also recently cut its research and development (R&D) spending by almost half, helping the company to boost its bottom line. R&D spending totaled $2.5 million in the last two quarters, down from $4.7 million in the year-ago period.

For the full fiscal year, R&D expenditures fell to $8.1 million, down 16 percent from $9.6 million in fiscal 1998.

''I think the accounting is pretty aggressive,'' Niles said. ''It just seems very odd that you have trouble in getting this technology to market, but you are shortening the time period over which you are recognizing the contracts.''

Niles said Intel's publicly announced delay of its Rambus- based 820 chipset in September would stretch into next year. The product had been due to ship last spring, then rescheduled for last month, he noted.

''If 820 doesn't make it to market, that's it for Rambus. Because that's the reason people own the stock,'' he said.

Other analysts were less fearful. Edelstone of Morgan Stanley said Intel may ship the Rambus-based chipset later this year, but even if it waits until early next year, there will be little long-term difference in Rambus' big returns.

Though infrequent, questions over a company's accounting can shake investor confidence, leading them to dump shares of a company first and ask questions later.

For example, shares of Tyco International Inc. tumbled 15 percent earlier this week after an accounting expert raised questions about the way the industrial conglomerate had questioned its accounting practices.



To: Don Green who wrote (32235)10/15/1999 11:52:00 PM
From: Don Green  Respond to of 93625
 
O.T. But Interesting

The big question: How far is down?

By Zapman, CBS MarketWatch
Last Update: 6:18 PM ET Oct 15, 1999 Letters to the editor (A.k.a. the whine rack.)

SAN FRANCISCO (CBS.MW) -- At last, the market has broken out of the doldrums. You may not be thrilled about the direction, but you shouldn't be surprised. Nor should you be surprised if it heads still lower over the next several weeks. Zapman thinks that's likely.

The Dow's now back around 10,000 and I still think there's a risk it could drop farther, perhaps as much as 2,500 points.
Can you imagine the Dow back under 8,000?

Zapman hates the kind of football game that is played between the 40 yard lines, so the recent market downturn was actually more refreshing than painful. But -- as Alan Greenspan noted in his comments on the "equity premium" -- investors should take a close look at the risk in stocks given the bloated valuations of the equity market. (See full story.)

Translation: These aren't CDs you're buying. They're stocks. And stocks go up, and stocks go DOWN. Sometimes they go WAY down, although it's difficult for investors in the 1990s to keep that in mind. In 1974, the Dow lost 27 percent, and that was only its seventh worst year.

Greenspan and his friends at the Fed have been credited as the geniuses behind the bull market of the 1990s. But somehow, investors go deaf when the Fed warns things could get ugly. The Chairman has clanged the warning bell repeatedly this year, and sometimes the market has hesitated, then resumed its reckless drive higher.

This happened Oct. 5 when the Fed tightened its bias on interest rates. See full story. The Dow closed around 10,400, then rose the next week to 10,648. It's mostly fallen since then, but how low can it go? Greenspan clearly is warning now that it can go much lower. Are you listening?

The Dow's ranged from 7,805 to 11, 429 within the past year. The Nasdaq rose even more sharply. Is it so hard to believe that trend could be reversed?
Watch out below

In my ever-so-humble Zapmanesque way, I've tried to tell you it's time to watch out.

In March, when the Dow was around 10,000, I warned it was possible to fall back all the way to the neighborhood of 7,300.

You can rightly accuse me of being "premature" -- the market rose to 11,428 this summer -- but I'd prefer the word "cautious." The Dow's now back around 10,000 and I still think there's a risk of it falling farther, perhaps as much as 2,500 points. Can you imagine the Dow back under 8,000?

In May, I wrote that while you may enjoy the risky values of Web stocks, you should be ready to pull out because a shakeout is inevitable. (See full story.) It's still true. While some Web companies are sure to flourish, many more are just as likely to see a decline as impatient investors start demanding actual earnings in the months ahead.

Choose wisely

That's not to say there's no value in the market. Just a reminder that you must choose stocks wisely and not expect index mutual funds to behave like passbook savings accounts.

MarketWatch Editor-in-Chief Thom Calandra tells me he thinks the Dow could bottom as low as 8,000, although he sees plenty of reasons to stay invested. "I think the Dow is filled with companies that are extremely undervalued," he told me after Greenspan's latest remarks. "GE (GE: news, msgs) is perhaps the best example -- a company that has its hands in the areas of banking, manufacturing and media around the world. I think fair value is relative, relative to the level of pain -- that is, volatility -- you can withstand in your personal, professional and investing lives."

Markets Editor Kevin Marder noted on Friday there's been a "dramatic shift in sentiment over the past three days from complacency to fear. Since most market bottoms occur amid a climate of investor fear, this is actually a big positive. (Friday's) high level of option buying is evidence of this shift."

Fear vs. panic

True enough, but what that doesn't address is the degree of fear that exists today versus the utter panic that could ensue if the market finds reason -- weak corporate earnings, signs of inflation, another global economic shock -- to send the Dow down another 10 or 15 percent.

Indeed, a sign of inflation came in Friday's PPI report. (See full story.) On one level, that's an isolated statistic, and retail investors are foolish to change their strategies based on a single number. On another, it's a symptom that the Fed was right to tighten its bias earlier this month.

Closing thought: a little back-pedaling isn't such an awful thing in the long-term. The gains of the past few years have, indeed, been a bit irrational. When the dust settles, the market should be far more stable, enabling equities to march forward with a bit more confidence