Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CDDD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (78)	10/17/1999 9:47:00 AM
From: Tatnic	Respond to of 924

This should be a good fight.

To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (78)	10/18/1999 10:26:00 AM
From: SEAN007	Respond to of 924

<<<<Please sell me your shares To the boys: >>>> Who is your broker?

To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (78)	10/18/1999 3:50:00 PM
From: StockDung	Respond to of 924

sec.gov On May 23, 1997, a complaint was filed against Nu-Tech Bio-Med, Inc. (the "Company") and others in an action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York captioned Mordechai Gurary v. Isaac Winehouse, Isaac Winehouse d/b/a Wall & Broad Equities and Nu-Tech Bio-Med, Inc. (Docket No. 97 Civ. 3803 (LBS)). As of the date of this report, service of the complaint has not been effected upon the Company. The complaint alleges that the Company and the other defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 349 of the General Business Law of the State of New York (the "GBL"). The claims against the Company under the Exchange Act and the GBL are purportedly based on allegations that the Company knew of and failed to disclose, among other things, unlawful trading activity in the Company's securities by the other defendants named in the action.

To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (78)	10/18/1999 5:37:00 PM
From: StockDung	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 924

Please sell me your shares Litigation ---------- On August 3, 1998, Mercacorp, Inc. filed an action in the U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Wall & Broad Equities, Inc., a "purported investment banking establishment" and Isaac Weinhouse, the principal of such purported investment banking establishment, asserting violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and common law fraud in connection with the alleged issuance of false press releases, misrepresentations and omissions by all of the defendants on which the plaintiff allegedly relied in purchasing the Company's Common Stock. The action seeks both actual and punitive monetary damages from the Company in the amounts of $5 million and $50 million, respectively. On November 11, 1998, the plaintiff dismissed the action, with prejudice, and the parties agreed to a release of all claims. In connection with the dismissal and release of claims the Company issued the plaintiff two separate warrants to purchase Common Stock. Under the first warrant, the plaintiff is entitled to purchase up to 750,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $4.00 per share, the closing bid price on 8 November 10, 1998, and under the second warrant, the plaintiff is entitled to purchase up to 750,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share. Both of the warrants contain certain prohibitions against assignment and transfer to third parties as well as other terms and conditions. No provision has been made in the condensed consolidated financial statements with respect to this matter as of September 30, 1998.

To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (78)	10/19/1999 12:40:00 AM
From: WTMHouston	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 924

I have not said that CDDD is a hoax: those were your words not mine. I merely asked some questions, which you apparently cannot answer. Maybe you can answer them if I ask them one at a time. So, when and where is the Silicon Valley demonstration? Despite you not be able or willing to answer any of my questions, I will answer yours. <<Your 100% right. C 3 D Inc merely a hoax. The demostration [sic] that they have made are all an illusion. . . . . Where do I stop ?>> I don't know. Where do you stop? Maybe when you do stop though, you can start answering some questions. <<Please sell me your shares>> I don't have any. That was the point. Better yet, why don't you loan me yours so I can short them. But, you have to agree not to call them. <<I have deep pockets, the question is do you? >> Yes, for all that it matters. <<Because, if I do my math correctly, you are probably taking a perverbial [sic] beating right about now.>> Must be some kind of new math. No short yet as I have been unable to find shares. <<YOU MUST HAVE DEEP POCKETS OR A VERY UNDERSTANDING WIFE . . . . .OR BOTH. >> Both actually, not that I have needed either in relation to this stock. Can you answer any of my initial questions or even the sole one set forth above? Troy