Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (80951)	10/17/1999 3:06:00 PM
From: H James Morris	Respond to of 164684

>>The UCLA people don't pay any attention to the big game, they don't consider Stanford to be a competitor.<< Lizzie, UCLA doesn't know as much as Forrester Research and never will. Washington at Cal next week. I'm hoping to attend the game. Are they still smoking pot over at Berkeley? I haven't smoked pot since I shorted Amzn back a couple of years ago, and never will again. All I could see at the time was the "Things" stock price going higher, and higher along with my head.;-) Ps Speaking about Forrester as you probably know I bought it in the mid-20's. A couple of weeks ago I was tempted to buy Jupiter (Jptr) on the IPO because I love to be apart of even a #2 that knows so damn much. Well they ran it almost up to Forresters 52 week high of 49, and I'm thinking how could they do that, knowing that Jptr is only 1/2 of Forrester in every category, except one? That one exception is this. Jptr is more of a niche Internet researcher than Forrester. Meaning Jptr gets almost all it's revenue from I-net companies while I guess Forrester gets revenue from other than just I-net sources. Hey! I'm glad I passed. It's down to it's low of 31. The only ones left that are still above water are the lucky one's that got shares from DLJ at 21, and I wasn't one. But I sure tried. Trust me on that.