Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (75784)	10/18/1999
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578634

Stevesef - Re: "The chips were originally expected in September, but were pushed back due to design issues." Sounds like .18 aluminum problems to me. "design issues"" Now I really understand how STUPID you are !!!! You haven't a CLUE what a DESIGN issue and a PROCESS issue are. That's understandable - like, why else would you invest in AMD ?? If you knew ANYTHING, then you wouldn't have plowed your money into that loser of an investment. A real loser, huh, Stevie Wonder ? Paul

To: steve harris who wrote (75784)	10/18/1999 12:18:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578634

STEVE - <Aluminum Coppermine problems:> "Al problems" had zero, nada, zip, to do with it. Show me where in that article you see Al problems? Show me any credible source that indicates Al problems. You are clearly straying into a realm in which you have inadequate information and background, and it appears that you are reaching for the most convienent thing you can grasp. This is old news Steve. Whatever caused the announced 1 month Coppermine delay has long since been fixed. I'd suggest moving on. I have. PB