Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MikeM54321 who wrote (5581)	10/18/1999 11:23:00 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12823

Mike, Thread, compatibility issues should be minimized if adherence to NGDLC standards (GR 303) are met. Although, these do not at the present time take into account all of the emerging forms of traffic that can be sent in all their permutations. But the basics physical layer and many of the Layer 2 rudiments are covered within precribed parameters. Also, the ONU philosophy tracks back to the Passive Optical Network (PON) designs, and prior, as they have been incorporated in the Full Service Area Network (FSAN) architectures which were defined by Bellcore some three years ago, or thereabouts. These have been discussed here, on various occasions in this thread, over the past two or three years. There are some excellent articles complete with drawings at the Telephony Mag site at internettelephony.com Do a search in the archives for either FSAN and/or PON. Despite some of these articles being two years or more on the books, they are still highly relevant. In telco terms, two calendar years represents short term tactical planning. Only telling it like it is. One such article that stands out can be found at: internettelephony.com Regards, Frank Coluccio