SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (76006)10/19/1999 2:06:00 AM
From: Mani1  Respond to of 1574800
 
Paul Re <<I have heard 400/800 MHz RAMBUS DRDRAM may be 25% to 100% more expensive than PC100 SDRAM>>

I have hear that RDRAM takes 50% more die size than SDRAM.

Considering that yields are much lower and there is that royalty to RMBS, I would think the cost is a lot closer to 100%.

Mani



To: Paul Engel who wrote (76006)10/19/1999 2:25:00 AM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574800
 
RE:"I have heard 400/800 MHz RAMBUS DRDRAM may be 25% to 100%
more expensive than PC100 SDRAM."...

In that case Intel had better get out a "real" 133 MHZ chipset other than the limited 810e.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News