SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza who wrote (2506)10/19/1999 11:11:00 AM
From: slacker711  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13582
 

Don't you think that Intel would have cleared the license issue with the Q before purchasing DSP? It seems to me that some sort of agreement or understanding would have necessarily been in place as part of the deal. Otherwise, Intel takes too big a risk that the license issue will not be resolved after it invests in DSP. Result: A really bad situation.

I agree....However the only direction that the licsensing fee will go is up. If my calculation of a 12% royalty on DSP's sales is correct....I wonder what Intel will eventually have to pay?

Anybody have any ideas how the Q would structure a license for a chip that would eventually be incorporated into a laptop? I dont think that the box-makers would go for a 5% off of the top royalty....though it never hurts to dream <g>.

Slacker