SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeff Mizer who wrote (8963)10/19/1999 1:50:00 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 9818
 
>>>The guide is introduced with a letter from Pennsylvania Lt. Governor Mark Schweiker.

"Some people are predicting catastrophic consequences. However, there is no foundation for
this extreme position," Lt. Governor Schweiker writes.

But then we began paging through the state's Y2K preparedness guide... <<< It goes on to suggest there is a contradiction between the letter and the Guide.

Jeff, the above is a clip from the item you posted. I'm not sure from the site who the "we" is that authored the item, but I found "their" bemusement odd so I looked up the "Consumer's Guide to Y2K Planning" that was referenced. It looks like the standard-issue government view to me--the hurricane/earthquake/snowstorm approach--which does not contradict the cover memo IMO. RE taking an extreme position, here is a quote from the Guide:

"Also, many so-called ?Y2K
survivalists? advocate stockpiling
months of water, food, and medicine
to prepare for potential emergencies
in the year 2000. If people follow
this advice, it won?t matter if our
systems fail. People, not computers,
will create a great catastrophe in
2000 by causing shortages that
seriously disrupt our food supply
system.
The American Red Cross
suggests preparing as you would for
a severe winter storm?by keeping a
one- to two-week supply of essential
food, water, and medicine. If we act
responsibly as citizens and consumers,
we can all be ready for Y2K and
other potential emergencies."

Looks to me like "We" was really spinning this one and hoped no one would take the trouble to look deeper. I noticed that there were no links provided, but it wasn't hard to find.

pa2k.org

Karen