Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Dutch Central Bank Sale Announcement Imminent? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldsheet who wrote (8231)	10/19/1999 7:35:00 PM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 81205

Bob, in the past I have never held or had any connection thru another person place or thing with the big gold producers like NEM, HM or Barrick or any of the others in their size, or of a lesser size. My total exposure is in 3 companies, 2 of the Arizona desert dirt variety one in chapter 11 and the other now 6 pennies a share, and the third in legal conflict with the country Mongolia as the mine is idle. To my knowledge none of these three have ever mined an oz of gold, and in the next months I have no plans to buy or sell of these 3, and I have no plans to invest into any other gold/silver related mining companies. Also, as for the metal silver, only the Mongolian one has land with silver in Canada, and as yet none mined. Unlike o49r I hold no land that would be considered minable. By the way, o49r mentioned that she is also into The Bones, but more of to find a prehistoric monster to sell over the internet. So, my point being that I gather that your joke about gata has an origin that was created by the gata push of asking all shareholders to dump any shares in any company with hedging, and Barrick has been mentioned by gata as the one with the most. As knowned by all that you are of one of the tops in knowing this stuff, not as in a pay per view newsletter, but as in sharing your knowledge. My guess is that either you hold ABX currently under present day value, or another or others with hedging present, and feel or guess or know that each is in good shape with solid and sound past and present business practices. If so, then gata is playing unfair and willing to hurt or harm any gold producer that will not join its side. Eventhought I know not this stuff, my impression is that this is correct and I reconize that I have pushed their line. Rather than address me in a reply, please post an open post to gata and Bill Murphy on how they can accomplish their agenda in a different way. You do not have to agree or support the manipulation and collision theory about price of gold, but assume gata will continue their quest, and they will welcome another approach or a modified one, if it will take them to a mode so they feel their progress and message is made. Doug