Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : HITSGALORE.COM (HITT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhild who wrote (4523)	10/19/1999 3:53:00 PM
From: PatiBob	Respond to of 7056

Heck, I figured they just wanted my kids to get to work sooner than later...........or was that me? :-) PB

To: jhild who wrote (4523)	10/19/1999 5:23:00 PM
From: Q.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7056

re. <<It used to be a problem that people would get multiple numbers>> Funny you mention that. There are tax lien records for person(s) named Dorian Reed living at several addresses in zip codes 917XX, including Rancho Cucamonga, from 1992-1996. These public records show two different social security numbers. For the social security number appearing on a state tax lien of 10/26/1992 and a federal tax lien of 01/24/1996, Informus.com tells me it was: ISSUED between 1969 and 1970 in MI There was a completely different social security number appearing on a state tax lien of 12/23/1996. For that one, Informus tells me it was: ISSUED between 1934 and 1951 in CA. Is it possible that there are two different people named Dorian Reed living in Rancho Cucamonga and the surrounding area? FWIW, Dorian Reed is a very uncommon name. Dorian Sr. and Dorian Jr., perhaps? Or just one guy using two different numbers for his taxes?